Microfossils
This is a term
used to describe a wide diversity of groups that are basically too small
to find in the field. The boundary is somewhere around a millimetre,
although some are very much smaller than this. The technique used to
study them is generally bulk sampling and dissolution: take some lumps
of promising rock to the lab, drop it in acid, and look at what comes
out in an electron microscope.
Broadly, they can
be divided into organic and phosphatic microfossils. There are also
siliceous ones, but sponge spicules are treated under ‘sponges,’
radiolarians are unknown from Builth, and silicified calcareous fossils
have also not yet been found in an extractable state. In fact, the microfossils
recorded here have largely been found by chance, on the surfaces of
slabs, and a thorough search for them is yet be to be undertaken. This
is a huge gap in the record of Builth Inlier fossils. Does anyone want
to do something about it?
Organic
microfossils
Although they have
not been studied in detail, there are two broad types of organic microfossil
present in the area: chitinozoans and acritarchs. Acritarchs are the
resting cysts of probably unicellular algae or protists (quite possibly
relatives of dinoflagellates), and can reach a millimetre or so in diameter,
but are usually much smaller. They typically have a reticulate pattern
on the surface, sometimes with spiny ‘appendages.’ There
is likely to be quite a high diversity, but their study is a specialised
field involving very nasty acids and powerful microscopes. I have occasionally
seen some on the surfaces of pale shales under a simple microscope.
Chitinozoans are
usually less than two millimetres long, but rarely less than a tenth
of millimetre, so many of them are visible as tiny reflective grains
on the surface of mudstones. They are flask-shaped, sometimes with a
lot of fine detail (more spiky appendages) under an electron microscope,
but again, have effectively not been studied from here. They are believed
to be the eggs of an unknown animal, and this is borne out by occasional
discoveries of articulated arrays of lots of chitinozoans inside an
organic envelope. Such things have also been found at Llanfawr, but
not yet perfectly preserved. Better specimens are the path to fame and
glory, for the chitinozoans are among the last great palaeontological
enigmas…
Except for what
seems to be a single fish scale, and a couple of enigmatic phosphatic
spines, the only vertebrates known from the Inlier are the tiny, primitive
conodonts. The only mineralised (and therefore ‘preservable’)
parts of them are their teeth, which in general are less than a millimetre
long. Each animal was an eel-like creature with large eyes at the front,
and no jaws (we know this thanks to extraordinary fossils from Edinburgh
and South Africa). The teeth make a grasping array, and include up to
seven or eight different shapes in one animal. Some are simple cones,
but others are extravagant affairs of numerous spikes along one or more
axes. Very rarely, you might find a collection of several conodonts
in a nearly-symmetrical array; these represent their positions in the
living animal, and are vital to understanding which teeth belong to
which species.
Usefully, the colour
of conodonts changes from pale yellow, through brown and black, to white
and finally transparent, depending on the temperature that the rocks
have experienced. White indicates around 400-500 C. Black ones are often
difficult to distinguish from scolecodonts (see worms),
except to the specialist.
[2]Acritarch
indet. Up to 1 mm diameter, usually much less.

[5]Angochitina
sp. Up to ~ 0.4 mm.

[5]Conodonts
A-B.

[1]Conodont
C.

[2]Conodont
D. [Maximum size for conodonts around 2 mm, usually less than 0.5 mm.]

[4]Conodont
E. [approximate form – flanges towards viewer difficult to see.]

[5]Cyathochitina sp. Up to 0.5 mm.

[5]Desmochitina sp. ~ 0.1 – 0.2 mm.

[5]Rhabdochitina
sp. Up to 2 mm.

[5]Spathognathodontid indet. Approx 1 mm.

To be drawn:
[2]Hystrichosphaeridium? sp. An acritarch with branching spines, ~0.1 mm.
[5]fish
scale (thelodont?)
[5]phosphatic spines (vertebrate?)